Federalists vs Anti-Federalists

84

By aliciaharrell

In the beginning of our country, the United States of America, the original two parties who helped create the Constitution were the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Parties. Even then, our Founding Fathers, were separated into two factions who did not see eye to eye.

The Federalist were prominent businessmen who had fought in the American Revolution. The most well known Federalist was the 2nd President of the United States John Adams who was the very first Vice President of the United States when George Washington served as President. John Adams stood for a fiscally sound and strong nationalistic government, but disagreed with Alexander Hamilton's economic program that involved the Federal Government to incur the debts of all the states caused by the American Revolution. Hamilton's program would have caused a "national debt", the means to pay it off by having a national bank. Even then "national debt" was an issue, but the Hamilton Economic Program was not enforced because John Adams pointed out the ludicrousness of a country starting off with a "National Debt".

The Anti-Federalists, also fought in the American Revolution, were pro what we now know as The Bill of Rights. They were mostly farmers and workers, not the prominent business owners. They were opposed to a strong nationalistic government. They opposed the originally drafted US Constitution, until the Bill of Rights were added as Amendments, insisting it made the National Government too strong and the ability to wield too much power over the States. They were pro very small national government involvement, have a national government for the sole purpose of giving other countries a way to reach the States and communicate with them with very little authority in order to preserve the sovereignty of the States. A very famous Anti-Federalist was Patrick Henry, who gave many speeches about freedom, liberty, and the hazards of having a national government. The Anti-Federalists did not want an authoritarian national government, fearing it would try and take away their rights including "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". They wanted to maintain EVERY THING listed in the Bill of Rights. Why they diligently fought to have it added to the original US Constitution as the first set of Amendments.

As we know, the US Constitution plus the new Amendments (known as The Bill of Rights) was ratified and accepted by the original states. Even though the Federalists wanted a strong and fiscally sound national government, they too did not wish to lose any rights, especially those listed in The Bill of Rights. Their idea of a strong national government equaled a government with three executive branches, neither over each other instead overseeing one another, that would protect the rights of the citizens. Their idea of a strong national government was one "for the people, and by the people". The US Constitution is each citizens and states contract with the Federal (national) Government. The Federalists further felt a fiscally sound (one without debt) would be the best. Why originally our dollars were on the gold standard, backed by gold. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists did agree that the national government should have funds and NEVER exceed them.

For more information of the origination of the United States of America please read the writings and speeches of Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, John Adams, and all other Founding Fathers including the books about the Continental Congress, and all Founding Fathers.

For a list of Founding Fathers please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States

Arguments of the Anti-Federalists view that cemented the Bill of Rights inclusion into the US Constitution: http://www.pinzler.com/ushistory/argantfedsupp.html

The Bill of Rights: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

 

Comments

Matt Easterbrook 2 years ago

I enjoyed this historical article. Very interesting and informative.

melbrown1 profile image

melbrown1 2 years ago

Great and informative hub. It is ironic to see similarities in our 2 party system.

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 years ago

I am facinated by how history repeats itself and how some issues do not seem to disappear, usually are in debate. Thank you for your comments Matt and Mel. Feedback is most welcome :)

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Level 8 Commenter 2 years ago

This is a marvelous article. I love history and so enjoyed your work here. You have yourself a new fan!

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 years ago

Thank you James! Appreciate your heartfelt response to my hub :)

escritor profile image

escritor 2 years ago

Thanks Alicia, for a good hub and a good topic. It is important to learn what happened, but just as important, is why it happened. Good job.

Alan

brian  2 years ago

love this artical im doing a project on the history of this and you just got me an a+

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 years ago

Awesome! Glad my article was a big help for your project, a good deed indeed :)

David P Shirk profile image

David P Shirk 2 years ago

Great article :-)

I really wish you had more article space to discribe the rest of the similarities as well, such as media abuse, one side claiming to be something its not, politicians claiming to be what they were'nt etc. I mean, Hamilton was pushing to get back toward the Aristocratic system, and I believe it was a huge mistake for Washington to make him Secretary of Treasury.

It should also be noted that Washington grew to hate what the new government became before he was even dead - politics was not in his nature, and he hated how it grew into what it did. Even most of the federalist back then would be appaled at what we have today.

5 stars man - will need to keep up with your posts!

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 years ago

Thank you for the "five stars" :) My hub's theme was pointing out that some of today's issues are very old and were the concern of our Founding Fathers. You do bring up some valid points in your comment - much appreciate.

Our Founding Fathers were in hopes that future generations would "come up" with something better than they had that would secure each citizen's inalienable rights and each citizen's liberty. Yes, all of them would be aghast by how strong our current federal government is today, all the laws pro the criminals, and our paying 35% (on the average) of our paychecks in national income tax.

Our Founding Fathers were liberal for their time, but if compared to today's standards would be categorized as very conservative.

Molly 2 years ago

Thanks so much! I've been trying to write a paper defending the anti-federalists, and I couldn't find any ideas until I found this article. Thanks so much!

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 years ago

This is why I am compelled to write. Hubs reach others. Ideas are shared. Thank you Molly for your inspirational feedback. :)

Starjor 2 years ago

This is very informative this will really help me get an A thank you.

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 years ago

Great! Delighted to help others receive A's by sharing informative non-fiction hubs like this one. Thanks for the uplifting feedback Starjor :)

maplethorpej profile image

maplethorpej 23 months ago

When the citizens at the time voted, did they vote for either the federalist or the non-federalist as we do the democrat or the republican?

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 23 months ago

When it came time for the citizens to vote in the beginning of the USA (after becoming a nation), they had only one type of ballot (not the political party ballots like we do today). At the Constitutional Convention where the US Constitution was voted upon and ratified the voting system was primarily oral and a by hand vote.

Neil74 profile image

Neil74 15 months ago

Interesting history. Just like many other nations which were formed by opposing parties.

Rachel 15 months ago

Thanks for sharing this. This is very helpful. We are learning about federalists and anti federalists in civics. So thanks (:

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 15 months ago

Neil, the USA was the first in the 1700's to break successfully away via a revolution from a monarchy. They did it without a bloodbath after the revolution (unlike France and Russia who held their revolutions later) which is why it seems similar to other countries who had opposing parties.

Rachel, I am glad to be of help. I enjoyed Civics and wish you all the best with your studies. :)

bewhuebner profile image

bewhuebner Level 1 Commenter 15 months ago

I just stumbled on this article and enjoyed it very much! It's amazing to me how we have so much disagreement and strife politically but the Founder's specifically spelled out much of what they thought in their writings. The Federalist Papers is a great source for this kind of stuff. You've got a new follower after this one! Thanx for the good read :)

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 15 months ago

Thank you for your insightful and uplifting feedback. Appreciate you enjoying this article and for being one of my followers. I shall return the favor so we may know when each of us writes a new hub as a method of sharing hubs. Yes, the Federalist Papers and all the written works our Founding Fathers published are something one should read; especially every elected US government official in Washington D.C.

lolo 2 months ago

we are federalist

Kenrhoden profile image

Kenrhoden 2 months ago

Extremely interesting article. Thank you for taking the time to research and write it. I enjoy reading the points of view from talented, intelligent individuals.

www.kenrhoden.com

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 months ago

Thank you for your thoughtful comment. Yes, today we are more of a federalist state than when the US began. Thank you for reading my hub; much appreciated. :)

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 months ago

Thank you for enjoying my hub and your kind feedback. It is nice to have someone notice the effort of research involved in writing this type of piece.

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 2 months ago

Thank you very much Lolo and Kenrhoden for your thoughtful comment. It is good to see people reading the articles I write and having a positive reaction to them. Lolo, currently the US Government is acting more Federalist than Anti-Federalist. In the beginning of our country's history it was the reverse. The USA has Anti-Federalist roots. :D

Bair 12 days ago

Your article finally helped me to understand the Federalist vs the Anit Federalist. My Politcial Science professor did a horrible job at lecturing us on this topic. THANK YOU!

aliciaharrell profile image

aliciaharrell Hub Author 7 days ago

Thank you Bair! :D Delighted my hub was helpful for a better understanding of our US government roots.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working